Question 1: Case 1 A 17-year-old comes to your office, asking for birth control.

Question 1:
Case 1
A 17-year-old comes to your office, asking for birth control. In addition, she requests that her parents not be informed. What will you do?
Case 2
A young couple is desiring to space out the timing of having children. What will you advise?
Case 3
A young man who has struggled since adolescence with same sex attraction has met another such young man at church, who is suggesting they be married. What do you advise?
Case 4
A woman consults you because her husband feels their marital life is boring. He wants to have them utilize pornography, but it makes her uncomfortable. They have been married 10 years, and he feels that he might be unfaithful if she does not acquiesce to him. They are Christians and want to know your best advice.
Case 5
A young couple believes they cannot be married yet because of financial constraints, but are engaging in heavy petting and wish to know, as Christians, what you think. Their avowed goal is to refrain from intercourse until marriage.
Case 6
A thirteen year old female tells you that she feels that she is a male trapped in a female body. What do you want to advise. Her mother trusts your opinion and wants an honest answer.
Question: Should the government fund sex studies?
Discussion Thread: Sex
Five Case Studies from Chapter 3 in the text (These evaluations will follow the format as per page 11. This will be the protocol required for every case in each chapter.)
Should the government fund sex studies?
Answer the question in the PDF in the section PRINCIPLES OF BIO-MEDICAL ETHICS this is the protocol required for each case in the discussion also answer the Questions.
Use this protocol for each case in the discussion:
1. Respect for Autonomy: Recognize and respect the moral worth of rational beings who have the ability to self-govern2. Nonmaleficence: Avoid causing unnecessary harm
3. Beneficence: Do good by promoting the health and well-being of patients
4. Justice: Fairly distribute benefits, risks, and costs
After examining the case, carefully fill in each available space using features from the case, supported by the Principles of Bio-Medical Ethics.
What case are you examining?
What principles are relevant to the case?
Clearly explain how they apply to the moral features of the case.
What is the relevant medical information?
Comment on the CMDA position as it relates to this case.
What Bible verses (at least 4) can you cite that provide an indication of overarching principles?
What resolution do you suggest?
Journal Entry: Sex Assignment
Required to write a Journal Entry about the Discussion. In the entry, you will summarize what was discussed in your own words, talk about the topics, and provide novel insight gained from the discussion.
Summative journal this is not a reiteration of what you wrote on your original discussion board post, but a sketch of you interacting with your classmates (and me!) and what you now think. Maybe you think the same as you did before. Maybe you changed. But what did it make you consider? What have you seen in your life that is now questioned/ explained/ validated?
(must be 1,500–2,000 words)
Question 2:
Discussion Thread: Pain
One Case Study from Chapter 4 in the text which will follow the format as per page 11.
14 questions that appear throughout the chapter.
Is social drinking different from drinking coffee?
Is there a difference between using valium, tobacco, or marijuana?
Answer the questions and cases in Chapter 4 using the PDF document.
Journal Entry: Pain Assignment
Required to write a Journal Entry about the Discussion. In the entry, you will summarize what was discussed in your own words, talk about the topics, and provide novel insight gained from the discussion.
Summative journal this is not a reiteration of what you wrote on your original discussion board post, but a sketch of you interacting with your classmates (and me!) and what you now think. Maybe you think the same as you did before. Maybe you changed. But what did it make you consider? What have you seen in your life that is now questioned/ explained/ validated?
(must be 1,500–2,000 words)