This written assignment requirement is case briefs submitted in the appropriate

Important - Read this before proceeding

These instructions reflect a task our writers previously completed for another student. Should you require assistance with the same assignment, please submit your homework details to our writers’ platform. This will ensure you receive an original paper, you can submit as your own. For further guidance, visit our ‘How It Works’ page.

This written assignment requirement is case briefs submitted in the appropriate legal format.
From the following case list discussed in your text, select three (3) cases that you feel are essential to an understanding of the evolution of Fourth Amendment legal interpretation and provide a one page legal brief for each case.
Additionally, discuss the importance of these cases and their contemporary relevance to the state of searches, warrants, and arrests today.
Please make sure that your case briefs follow the appropriate format and guidelines as you used in your previous courses. Choose from the following list of cases:Katz v. United States, 389 U.S. 347 (1967)
Kyllo v. United States, 533 U.S. 27 (2001)
Beck v. Ohio, 379 U.S, 89 (1964)
Maryland v. Garrison, 480 U.S. 79 (1987)
Payton v. New York, 445 U.S. 573 (1980)
Miller v. United States, 357 U.S. 301 (1958)
Tennessee v. Garner, 471 U.S. 1 (1985)
Chimel v. California,  395 U.S. 752 (1969)
Preston v. United States, 376 U.S. 364 (1964)
Warden v. Hayden, 387 U.S. 294 (1967)
Arizona v. Hicks, 480 U.S. 321 (1987)
Horton v. California, 496 U.S. 128 (1990)
Schneckloth v. Bustamonte, 412 U.S. 218 (1973)

Leave a Comment