I would like a literature review that consists of two parts: 1. the balance betw

Important - Read this before proceeding

These instructions reflect a task our writers previously completed for another student. Should you require assistance with the same assignment, please submit your homework details to our writers’ platform. This will ensure you receive an original paper, you can submit as your own. For further guidance, visit our ‘How It Works’ page.

I would like a literature review that consists of two parts: 1.
the balance between basic research and applied research, and 2. a discussion about the dispersal or concentration of public R&D investment. This review is crucial for my research, and I expect that both parts will be written in more than 1,200 words.
In my dissertation, I will quantitatively analyse the academic performance of publicly funded R&D projects and compare the results between basic research (blue-skies research) and applied research (mission-oriented research). I need your help to write a literature review of around 11 pages.
To be easier to understand, the methodology part is mainly based on Fortin 2013 (http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0065263). I will apply the analysis to two types of funding programmes focusing on basic research and applied research, respectively. The lack of comparison between the two types is the research gap I found.
Here, I list resources that will probably be useful. 
1. the balance between basic research and applied research
– Aagaard et al.(2020) Concentration or dispersal of research funding?, https://direct.mit.edu/qss/article-abstract/1/1/117/15557
This is a systematic review so its references might be useful as well.
– Fortin (2013) Big Science vs. Little Science: How Scientific Impact Scales with Funding, http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0065263
– Duan (2022) How large of a grant size is appropriate? Evidence from the National Natural Science Foundation of China, http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0264070
– Ohniwa et al. (2023) The effectiveness of Japanese public funding to generate emerging topics in life science and medicine, http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0290077
Its introduction part would help find more related materials.
– Mongeon et al. (2016) Concentration of research funding leads to decreasing marginal returns, https://academic.oup.com/rev/article/25/4/396/2525343
2. a discussion about the dispersal or concentration of public R&D investment
– Bentley (2015) The relationship between basic and applied research in universities, 
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-015-9861-2
– Mazzucato (2016) From market fixing to market-creating: a new framework for innovation policy, https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2016.1146124
– Mazzucato (2018) A problem-solving approach to fuel innovation-led growth, https://research-and-innovation.ec.europa.eu/knowledge-publications-tools-and-data/publications/all-publications/mission-oriented-research-innovation-eu-problem-solving-approach-fuel-innovation-led-growth_en
– Schot (2018) Three frames for innovation policy: R&D, systems of innovation and transformative change, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048733318301987
– Foray (2012) Public R&D and social challenges: What lessons from mission R&D programs?, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048733312002193
– Hoibrook (2013) Blue skies, impacts, and peer review, https://riviste.unimi.it/index.php/roars/article/view/2914
– Heinze (2008) How to sponsor ground-breaking research: A comparison of funding schemes, https://academic.oup.com/spp/article-abstract/35/5/302/1690595
– Wagner (2013) Evaluating transformative research programmes: A case study of the NSF Small Grants for Exploratory Research programme, https://academic.oup.com/rev/article/22/3/187/1523526

Leave a Comment