https://writingcenter.fas.harvard.edu/pages/counter-argument https://wilmu.instr

Important - Read this before proceeding

These instructions reflect a task our writers previously completed for another student. Should you require assistance with the same assignment, please submit your homework details to our writers’ platform. This will ensure you receive an original paper, you can submit as your own. For further guidance, visit our ‘How It Works’ page.

https://writingcenter.fas.harvard.edu/pages/counter-argument
https://wilmu.instructure.com/courses/66695/files/11210360/download?wrap=1This document is a piece of an effective opposing viewpoints section from a researched argument essay. The paper argues against the death penalty, and in this section the writer addresses the opposing viewpoint that the death penalty is a deterrent to crime. You will notice that the writer uses an unbiased tone throughout and also draws on research to support her refutation of the opposing viewpoint.
Classical Outlines: This section of the paper should be 4-6 pages. In this section, you will complete the arguments you have made in the Body section, and then address the Opposing Viewpoints, refuting each with specific evidence. See sections 3 and 4 of the outlines
Review the given resources and directions.
Write the Body 2 publish.
Upload a copy of your Body 2 publish section here in order to view your TurnItIn report.
Please remember that a high matching score means that you are quoting too much, or your Body 2 section is short compared to the number of sources you have cited. Your paper should be no more than 15% quoted material. (This percentage may be higher at this point in the writing process, you will work on condensing your essay and when you do so this number will drop.)
Remember to update your reference page when you add sources; however, I do not require all citations be complete in these publishs.

Leave a Comment