Discussion #2 consists of 2 parts. 1) As we continue reading Rodriguez’s autobio

Important - Read this before proceeding

These instructions reflect a task our writers previously completed for another student. Should you require assistance with the same assignment, please submit your homework details to our writers’ platform. This will ensure you receive an original paper, you can submit as your own. For further guidance, visit our ‘How It Works’ page.

Discussion #2 consists of 2 parts.
1) As we continue reading Rodriguez’s autobiography Hunger of Memory and identify evidence from the text to support a specific argument on the more significant influence of “advantage” or “adversity” on his “academic success,” in Discussion #2 we will want to consider the autobiography itself as a form of evidence. In what way, then, is the very production of Hunger of Memory evidence of Rodriguez’s “academic success?” In other words, how can the fact (of the text’s written production) help to support your argument on the main source of Rodriguez’s “academic success” – whether it is more the result of advantage or adversity?
2) It is also important that as we prepare the Persuasive Argument Essay we share both what our (1) argumentative position is as well as provide (2) cited evidence from the autobiography in support of this position. Therefore, what has turned-out to be your argumentative position on our Persuasive Argument Essay question: in Hunger of Memory, would you say that Richard Rodriguez’s “academic success” is portrayed more as the result of advantage or adversity? Cite at least 2 examples from the autobiography in support of your argument. (It is encouraged that you discuss 2 examples that you intend to discuss in your Persuasive Argument Essay.)

Leave a Comment