Conduct disciplinary research/inquiry by consulting a minimum of 3 scholarly, pe

Important - Read this before proceeding

These instructions reflect a task our writers previously completed for another student. Should you require assistance with the same assignment, please submit your homework details to our writers’ platform. This will ensure you receive an original paper, you can submit as your own. For further guidance, visit our ‘How It Works’ page.

Conduct disciplinary research/inquiry by consulting a minimum of 3 scholarly, peer-reviewed articles in one academic discipline.
This assignment is worth 50 points toward your final grade. It is graded using the rubric in Blackboard. To earn full credit, please complete the following tasks:
Earlier this semester you found scholarly resources in peer-reviewed journals using AUM’s library databases, Google Scholar, or some other search engine. This was a kind of inquiry to find literature relevant to your research topic.
Read at least 3 of the scholarly articles you found and take notes on what you are reading.
Then, write between 500-750 words (2-3 pages double-spaced) about 2 of these articles. Aim to answer the following questions about each article:
Why is each essay relevant to your research question/topic?
How does each essay add to your understanding or address knowledge gaps you have about the central research question/topic of your essay?
What evidence presented in each essay will help you to develop or advance your argument in your research project? How will this evidence help you to develop or advance your argument?
What evidence or reasons presented in each essay might challenge your argument? Why do you think it presents a challenge and how might you try to address the challenge?
In light of these essays, what additional resources might you need to consult to develop your argument?
You will be assessed on the basis of thoughtful completion of the answers to the above questions concerning at least 2 essays.
One additional note. Your thesis statement needs to be made more precise. First, you state that cyberbullying has effects on academic performance and wellbeing. But you haven’t stated specifically what those effects are. Remember, a thesis needs to be debatable and clearly state what you will defend. Second, the project would be more effective if it were focused on either academic performance or wellbeing, but not both. I would encourage you not to try to do both, but maybe to focus on just one of these.

Leave a Comment