Comparison between Robot-Assisted and Conventional Pedicle Screw Placement
Introduction
The placement of pedicle screws is a crucial step in spinal surgery. Precise positioning is essential for the stability and pullout strength of the screws. Robot-assisted placement promises higher accuracy and an improvement in postoperative outcomes. The aim of this cohort study is to compare the accuracy of screw placement using a robot versus the conventional method. The primary endpoint was the screw placement according to the Gertzbein-Robbins classification.
Methods
In a single-center, retrospective cohort study, 105 patients who were operated on with the aid of a robot were compared to 115 patients who underwent conventional surgery. Adults requiring dorsal instrumentation for degenerative diseases and fractures were included. Ethics committee approval was obtained.
Comparison between Robot-Assisted and Conventional Pedicle Screw Placement Intro
Important - Read this before proceeding
These instructions reflect a task our writers previously completed for another student. Should you require assistance with the same assignment, please submit your homework details to our writers’ platform. This will ensure you receive an original paper, you can submit as your own. For further guidance, visit our ‘How It Works’ page.
