Assessment 4: Reflection report Marking Criteria It is an individual reflection 

Assessment 4: Reflection report
Marking Criteria
It is an individual reflection report and marked on the broad criteria of:
·       Understanding ethical perspectives/concepts (20 marks)
·       Ethical issue recognition (20 marks)
·       Application of ethical perspectives/concepts (10 marks)
·       Depth of reflection (20 marks)
·       Response to feedback (10 marks)
·       Use of references (10 marks)
·       Structure (10 marks)
Length
1000 words approximately. Unless the lecturer tells you that these limits are strict, it is normally acceptable to be 10% above or below this word limit.
Weighting
30%
Assessment Due
All the students are required to submit by Week 10, Sunday11:59pm, UAE Time.
Type of Collaboration
Individual assessment and group work
Style and format
The individual reflection will be:
·       1000 words (It is acceptable to be 10% above or below this word limit)
·       Word-processed
·       Double-spaced
·       Size 12 Times new roman font
·       The individual reflection can be written in the first person.
·       Please use references as needed. Number of references is not important. The appropriate usage is important!
Detailed information 
It is an individual reflection. Students will need to provide a written response to the following question and submit it in the Moodle Turnitin. AI-tools are prohibited in writing this reflection report.
– Individual reflection questions: 
(1) What did you learn from workshops and collaborations with your teammates (i.e., industry-integrated learning)? Please answer by focusing on the concepts and theories related to sustainability that we learned during the semester (500 words).
(2) Reflecting on your participation in workshops, please discuss and articulate your systematic thinking (refer to Week 4 materials) in the practice of implementing and achieving the UN’s sustainable development goals as a member of society (500 words).