As we have seen in the readings and the lectures, feminist approaches to the stu

Important - Read this before proceeding

These instructions reflect a task our writers previously completed for another student. Should you require assistance with the same assignment, please submit your homework details to our writers’ platform. This will ensure you receive an original paper, you can submit as your own. For further guidance, visit our ‘How It Works’ page.

As we have seen in the readings and the lectures, feminist approaches to the study of international relations are typically guided by one of three empirical questions:
Would the world itself be different if more women held positions of power?
Would our view of the world be different if more women were engaged in the development of I.R. as a field?
Do women face unique problems in “the stuff” of International Relations?
Write up an 1-page analysis of any one of the multimedia pieces. The following elements should be included:
a summary of the main findings of the presentation in your own words (1/2 page)
a brief discussion of why one of the 3 “mainstream” theories of IR – Realism, Liberalism, or Constructivism – is inadequate for addressing the issues discussed in the source you reviewed (1/2 page)
a bibliographic citation to the source
Source:
J. Ann Tickner “Why Women Can’t Run the World,”  International Studies Review, Vol. 1, No. 3 (Autumn, 1999), pp. 3-11

Leave a Comment